Thursday, March 12, 2009

over preparation

I never thought I would say this about a test in law school, but I was actually over prepared. I spent most of my day yesterday trying to get in as much studying as I could. And then I spent 2 hours this morning creating name associations for each of the 42 possible cases we have discussed. Some of my favorites included:

  • Harry Potter has 2 best friends and wants to marry them but isn't allowed to (Potter v. Murray: you can criminally prosecute for polygamy)
  • If Britney Spears wants to take money from K-Fed, she needs to prove they were never divorced (Spearman v. Spearman: First wife has to prove that there was no divorce, preponderance of the evidence)
  • Jennifer W. Fuentes is pregnant and her child will be also be Maloni's (State ex rel Interest of JWF: a child born within a marriage is a de facto adoption)
  • Patrick Swayze wouldn't claim his dance partner's child on Dirty Dancing (Swayne v. LDS Social Services: dad didn’t claim to be father when given the chance and can't change his mind)
  • Blair and Chuck got into a car accident and she wants to claim insurance money (Whyte v. Blair: Car insurance. CL marriage: consent, cohabit, hold out to be married)
So after all of this hard work (trust me, coming up with 42 of these was actually really hard considering the oddness of some of the names), the professor only tested on 3 cases.

 
Template by mylolly.com